[WAsummit] white anti-racist response to the van jones attacks

[Nancy]

I'd be interested in your sharing what your are learning. nancy
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mary Capps 
  To: White Anti-racist Summit 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:00 AM
  Subject: Re: [WAsummit] white anti-racist response to the van jones attacks


  Thanks to everyone who has written on this topic. I'm learning a lot.


  Here in Mississippi and, it appears, around the country, white supremacists are using threats and intimidation to dominate or disrupt political debate & discussion. 
  That part (white supremacists) does feel like the 60s. 
  I am very concerned that the white supremacists are seizing control by defining people in & proposals from the Obama administration. The right wing media, national & local, plays a huge part in generating & disseminating lies & paranoia among whites. It is getting scarier. Killings would not surprise me. 
  I don't see much difference between Glen Beck & David Duke. Nor is there much difference in their white followers. (Remember Duke got two-thirds of the white vote when he ran for governor of Louisiana.)


  I believe we need to directly organize a counterattack to show, first,  the right wing attacks are rooted in white supremacy and racism; second, that there are whites who reject (and struggle against) racism, white supremacy, white threats & racist violence; and, third,  we need to quickly and specifically counter attacks, lies and smears such as those used against Van Jones. I believe we need to act in specific cases and on the ongoing, larger issue of a resurgent virulent & violent manifestation of white supremacy.


  Mary Capps


  On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Nancy wrote:


    Dara - thanks - it looks like this whole thing has become a tidal wave - hopefully will lead to some mobilized action on the larger issue - Van Jones is one of many - but this sure looks like the 1960's - they haven't killed the leaders - yet - but that threat certainly seems to loom over us. I will acknowledge Ludovic - I want to distribute the article at the next Saturday Dialogue meeting - an open meeting for white folx in Oakland, CA - Sept 26 Sat if any of you locals would like to come. We have been coached by Cameron and his group from AWARE, and have just celebrated our first year in existence. nancy
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Dara Silverman 
      To: White Anti-racist Summit 
      Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 3:51 PM
      Subject: Re: [WAsummit] white anti-racist response to the van jones attacks


      FYI- the piece I sent was written by Ludovic Blain.  Please acknowledge that if you forward it out.  Here's an updated version with a few new links:


      UPDATED: Can white liberals keep their eye on the prize when racism comes a knockin?
      Share
       Yesterday at 2:42am
      UPDATED: Can white liberals keep their eye on the prize when racism comes a knockin? at firedoglake- http://bit.ly/1iHYWh

      Please also read Taj's excellent piece 'Wake up call. The attack on Van is an attack on all of us.' http://bit.ly/NXIib Also read Michel Gelobter's "First they came for Willie Horton..." http://bit.ly/4s8Lt3 and Jeff Chang's Time To Knuckle Up :: On Van Jones’ Resignation http://bit.ly/xYlSO. (yes, i know these are 3 guys. Eva Paterson of Equal Justice Society also wrote a piece, but she did so organizationally, and is therefore covered below)

      I've been disappointed by white liberals and progressives' unwillingness and incompetence combating racism for 20 years. The inaction of large green groups on Van Jones resignation is yet another example.

      The NAACP, Equal Justice Society and Color of Change explicitely supported Van Jones before his resignation. On the white side, Treehugger, Grist and a few other small white organizations did. But the Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund, Greenpeace, and NRDC, who together must represent more than $100 million of mostly liberal and progressive foundations, big donors, and individual contributors money, were MIA. These groups either took a dive because the attacks on Van were racist, or they incompetently let the right set the terms of debate before entering. Either way America deserves better greens.

      UPDATE: On Sunday, Carl Pope of the Sierra Club, Justin Rubin of Moveon, Andy Stern of SEIU, and John Podesta gave mea culpa responses, with Carl and Justin actually mentioning the racism of Van's political lynching. I must say that Caucasian time makes bad politics.

      Here's today's Color Line Question: are there organized white liberals that can be trusted to maintain their commitment to their issue when the right attacks with racist wedges? I appreciate white fellow travelers, like Tim Wise, and small white anti-racist organizations like Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, on the racial justice path. But they seem to have no influence on larger white groups like the Sierra Club, NOW, Common Cause, Moveon, and other staples of the white left. To be clear, I'm not discussing whether white groups will take on issues of people of color, as I'm setting the bar much lower--can organized white liberals keep their eye on THEIR prize when the right's racism comes a calling?

      It's been easy for progressives to attack President Obama for not defending Van--but do they really expect Obama to be out in front of the white left? It seem hypocritical to attack the White House for being spineless without attacking NRDC, Sierra Club, EDF and Greeenpeace for being spineless as well.

      Lets remember--the most radical thing said by any national figure about racism in the recent past was Obama saying the white cop acted stupidly. The left certainly didn't counter the right's racist framing of Obama's articulation of a racist incident.

      In addition to this situation, in my political lifetime people of color have been let down by white national liberal organizations on mid-1990s welfare deform by white feminist groups, on prop 8 by white gay groups who blamed black voters for it's passage, by white communications organizations on any number of issues including California propositions 187 (anti-affirmative action) and 209 (anti--immigrant), and many other times. Although some examples are from a decade ago, I see no indication that white liberals are any better on racism now.

      Although whites will be a minority by around 2050, America has to survive that long. If white progressives either can't or won't oppose racism, then we'll need a new set of white progressive funders and leaders to do something better. And if white liberals continue to be unable or unwilling to challenge the right's racist attacks then we are truly on the path to fascism.

      If white liberals ultimately fail to oppose racism we have a bigger disaster on our hands than climate change, because America's commitment to white supremacy, if left unchallenged, will prevent us from dealing with the other important issues of the day, like climate change. As long as white liberals think these are parallel, rather than continuous tracks, they will continue to fail miserably.

      And the world and its humans of all races can't take too many more failures. Or, more accurately, the world and all its races can't take many more white failures.

      And now that the SEIU, Moveon, the Sierra Club, and CAP have given mea culpas, maybe they can gather their white beltway org peers to make plans to never again be silent during a political lynching. And their funders should pay attention-if white groups can't combat rightwingnut racist attacks, they certainly aren't good investments because they'll lose every time.



      On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sharon Martinas <cws at igc.org> wrote:

        Hey Nancy, 
        I appreciate your comments about Van and some background on his work.  I've known and admired him since he first came to the Bay Area in 1992.  For those who don't know him,  I just heard a short program interviewing Van about his work connecting low income youth of color to the movement for a cleaner planet, and the formation of the organization he headed up recently 'Green Jobs for All.'   (If you want to hear the interview, it might be accessible through www.thepromisedland.org.  Ask for audio of 'Visionaries in the world of work.'  It was aired today, labor day on KALW in SF.)


         I also appreciate the dialogue about what anti-racist white activists can and ought to do to address the race-baiting of Van, and the vicious attacks of the progressive work has has always done.  As always, I learn so much from all of you on this list serve. And I hope the dialogue leads to some forms of appropriate anti-racist action.


        I also want to agree with Nancy's praise of the Catalyst Project.  Catalyst does extraordinary work and its Anne Braden program to train white social justice activists as anti-racist organizers for collective liberation is a model I hope other organizations take inspiration and lessons from.


        However, Nancy's comment in parentheses "thanks Sharon Martinas" is incorrect.  While I know and have worked with many of the visionary members of The Catalyst Project for several years, I am not a member of their collective, and their decisions and the programs are what deserve the 'thanx,' not me.  What is historically correct is that many, not all, of the Catalyst Project collective members participated at one time or another in the Challenging White Supremacy workshop which I coordinated and which ended in 2005.  It is also true that many of us had and continue to have wonderful multi-generational dialogues about anti-racist organizing strategies in this era.  I learn so much from their wisdom.



        But I am not responsible, nor should I be praised, for the powerful and path-breaking work they do.  That praise goes to Catalyst Project collective members, not to me.



        Just wanted to set the record straight.



        much love and respect to all,  sharon







        On Sep 6, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Nancy wrote:


          Dara - I think Labor Day weekend is a perfect time for your communication. I think you are dead on. As a white woman I resonate with what you are saying, for sure. Organizing white folks for racial justice has never been more important. The right wing forces seem to be just warming up with the hate mongering. It is easy for us whiteys to just go "tsk tsk" and think our individual actions are enough.

          I've followed Van Jones for years, sent students to Cop Watch who had been assaulted by police, heard him and was inspired by his "cross-over" to connecting race and ecological issues - and was thrilled he was on the national team. I had hoped he was one voice from the progressive community who would have the ear of Obama. When he began to be attacked, I wrote letters of protest - probably on Color Lines and Truthout. This is the first I've heard of his resignation. I'll follow up with the standwithvan site.

          His treatment by the popular media and his resignation is one more indication of how skewed politics and stands for justice in this country remain. Loud statement about who runs this country. How and when do we collectively throw down the gauntlet? What would it be to launch a large inclusive movement or series of actions? Lakoff states that the progressive voice can't be heard because it uses intellect rather than appealing to the public's emotional responses.  

          AWARE has been trying to organize white folks for some years, and they have supported the beginning of a similar organization in Oakland we call Saturday Dialogues which has public meetings every 6 weeks. And Catalyst has been doing great work for years (thanks Sharon Martinas). And the UNtraining provides extensive personal work with white people. But we are small groups, and outreach is limited. Our UNtraining/Saturday Dialogue group attended The White Anti-racist Summit for that reason, and this continuing group is the best connection I have which includes activist white folks, and here we are. Doesn't justify any of it.

          Predominantly white liberal organizations and institutions seem to be key - the "white field" is hard to penetrate. Sierra Club is struggling with a newly elected Asian female president who wants to "reach out to People of Color." Progressive single-issue groups from old lesbians, Marxists, Buddhist meditation groups, universities, non-profits and governmental orgs I've been associated with are generally unconscious about their racism and it is hard to pin down. White privilege and white racism is slipperty. Effective action in those orgs is challenging without getting scapegoated and losing all influence. Diversity trainers shake their heads in corporations trying to deal with the white folx.  

          I'm not currently active in any of those orgs, but the whites I know who are (Greenpeace, Zen Centers) are working hard to wake up their colleagues - with sometimes sparce results, even if they are the designated diversity director. I am newly active in a group within the American Psychological Association that is struggling to get the APA to take a stand against psychologists involvement in torture. Clearly an ethical issue with race at the base of it, and folx are refusing to pay dues, resigning, writing articles in professional journals, holding symposiums at APA conventions, etc. Yet the power base refuses to move on it - there is lots of money and prestige involved, and there you go. (It isn't all white psychologists who are involved with the military around torture, of course, but we are primarily torturing People of Color).

          On a personal level, a friend of mine recently reminded me that when I sign petitions or write letters, to make sure I am identified as a 66 year old white woman, or my comments just go into the hopper, and doesn't say - here is one white woman who doesn't support any of the BS. That is a small thing, but now I make sure I identify myself.

          I will continue to write, sign petitions, encourage colleagues to take action on all of this and work within organizations I'm part of for the broader anti-racist agenda. But as far as effective organized action among whites - and solidarity with groups of Color to counter the power we are seeing from the right, I don't have a clue. Anyone in our list-serve have a really good sense of it? Isn't this why Sharon Martinas was trying to get us to read and discuss "Reluctant Reformers"? The record of white folx in movements has been pretty clear.

          Effective intervention still seems unclear. And we do not yet have a "movement" in the sense of the Civil Rights era, etc.  the Rightwing DOES have an effective movement afoot. I too am terrified about the rise of Fascism. Even worse, as one academic pointed out, at least the Fascist movements were committed to full employment for the population. That isn't part of the current agenda.

          Dara, I would like to use your colleague Blain's article with some of the white groups I'm connected with. (As well as a connection to Taj whom he mentions). I don't want to simply forward this message, which I will do, but use it as a powerful statement about what it takes to step up as white folx, and to challenge us. I know when I read it, I have an initial knee jerk defensive reaction - "I'm not like that, I'm one of the good white progressives" but then I have to see he is talking about my people and I am one of them, so what have I done, and am I gonna do beyond what I am doing? I want to have my white colleagues to examine that as well.

          Can you send the source?

          Thank you for your provocative communication. I look forward to hearing from others. 
          In solidarity, nancy arvold

            ----- Original Message -----
            From: Dara Silverman
            To: White Anti-racist Summit
            Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 8:16 AM
            Subject: [WAsummit] white anti-racist response to the van jones attacks


            Hey All,

            I know it's a holiday weekend and all, but I would love to hear some perspective from others on the whole Van Jones scape-goating and and his resignation. 

            I haven't worked with Van closely, but I've heard about him for years, and we travel in similar circles.  

            This website highlights ways to support him individually-http://standwithvan.com/

            I'm more interested in the systemic questions, especially what it raises for white people highlighted by my colleague Ludovic Blain below.  

            Any thoughts about action to take that could be useful? Not just in this situation, but for future situations because this won't be the last?

            Percolating,

            dara silverman



            Can white liberals keep their eye on the prize when racism comes a knockin?
             9/6/09 at 2:42am


            If you want a more collective approach go read Taj's excellent piece about 'Wake up call. The attack on Van is an attack on all of us.'

            I've been disappointed by white liberals and progressives' unwillingness and incompetence combating racism for 20 years. This Van Jones resignation is yet another example.

            As i can see, the NAACP, Equal Justice Society and Color of Change explicitely supported him. On the white side, treehugger and Grist did. Where's Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund, Greenpeace, and NRDC, who together must represent more than $100 million of mostly white liberals money. They either took a dive because Van is black, or they incompetently let the right set the terms of debate before entering. Either way America deserves better greens.

            For those who attack Obama for not defending Van--do you really expect Obama to be out in front of $100 million of white lefty heft? How are we gunna complain about him not doing what our white lefties won't even do? In other words, don't attack the WH for being spineless without attacking NRDC, Sierra Club, EDF and Greeenpeace for being spineless as well.

            Lets remember--the most radical thing said by any national figure about racism (not race) in the recent past was Obama saying the white cop acted stupidly. That didn't go so well.

            In my political lifetime POC have been let down by white national liberal organizations on this by white greens, on welfare deform by white feminist groups, on prop 8 by white gay groups, by white communications organizations on any number of issues including cali props 187 and 209, and i feel like the list can go on and on. and although some examples are froma decade ago, are white liberals any better on racism now?

            Are there organized white liberals that can be trusted to commit to their issue when the right attacks with racist wedges? Note here i am NOT saying are there white fellow travelers on the racial justice path. i am setting the bar much lower--can organized white liberals keep their eye on THEIR prize when the right's racism comes a calling? And do note, i'm saying 'organized'--tim wise is great (and cc'd here), but there's no national white groups listening to him.

            If the answer is no then we are truly on the path to fascism. Although whites will be a minority in most of our lifetimes, that'll only be true if we make it that far. And if white progressives won't and can't oppose racism, then we'll have to do something better in order to make it that far.

            If white liberals can't oppose racism we have a bigger disaster on our hands than climate change, because America's commitment to white supremacy, if left unchallenged, will prevent us from dealing with the other important issues of the day, like climate change. As long as white liberals think these are parallel, rather than continuous tracks, they will continue to fail miserably.

            And the world and it's humans of all races can't take too many more failures.

            yes, that was a kumbaya ending because i really wanted to write "and the world and all it's races can't take many more white failures."





--------------------------------------------------------------------



            _______________________________________________
            WAsummit mailing list
            WAsummit at lists.wacan.org
            http://lists.wacan.org/listinfo/wasummit

          _______________________________________________
          WAsummit mailing list
          WAsummit at lists.wacan.org
          http://lists.wacan.org/listinfo/wasummit




        _______________________________________________
        WAsummit mailing list
        WAsummit at lists.wacan.org
        http://lists.wacan.org/listinfo/wasummit





      -- 
      ----
      Dara Silverman
      RISE Consulting
      dara at riseup.net
      917-327-6528

      http://www.infovisions.org/rise/




--------------------------------------------------------------------------



      _______________________________________________
      WAsummit mailing list
      WAsummit at lists.wacan.org
      http://lists.wacan.org/listinfo/wasummit

    _______________________________________________
    WAsummit mailing list
    WAsummit at lists.wacan.org
    http://lists.wacan.org/listinfo/wasummit




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  WAsummit mailing list
  WAsummit at lists.wacan.org
  http://lists.wacan.org/listinfo/wasummit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wacan.org/pipermail/wasummit/attachments/20090908/574c85b3/attachment-0001.html>